Like many other states, California is known for its strict food safety and consumer protection regulations. Recently, the state has set its sights on a common food additive that has been widely used in many processed foods and beverages: Red Dye 3.

Red Dye 3, also known as E127, is a synthetic food coloring that is used to give a red hue to many foods and drinks, such as candies, baked goods, and beverages. It has been used in the food industry for over 80 years, but its safety has been called into question due to its potential health risks.

One of the major concerns about Red Dye 3 is that it may be a carcinogen or cancer-causing substance. In fact, in the 1970s, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted animal studies that showed Red Dye 3 caused thyroid tumors in rats. Since then, the FDA has labeled Red Dye 3 as “conditionally safe,” meaning that it is safe for use in small amounts, but further research is needed to determine its long-term effects.

In addition to its potential cancer risk, Red Dye 3 has also been linked to hyperactivity in children. A study published in the Journal of Pediatrics found that children who consumed beverages containing Red Dye 3 exhibited higher levels of hyperactivity than those who did not.

Because of these health concerns, California has proposed a ban on Red Dye 3. The state’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has determined that Red Dye 3 meets the criteria for being a carcinogen under California’s Proposition 65, which requires businesses to warn consumers about chemicals that may cause cancer or reproductive harm. If the ban is passed, manufacturers would be required to remove Red Dye 3 from their products sold in California.

Of course, the food industry is pushing back against the ban. They argue that Red Dye 3 has been extensively studied and has been deemed safe for use by the FDA. They also point out that the amounts of Red Dye 3 used in food products are very small and pose no real risk to consumers.

However, many consumer advocacy groups and health experts support the ban, arguing that even small amounts of Red Dye 3 can be harmful, especially to children. They also point out that alternative natural food colorings can be used in place of Red Dye 3.

Overall, the debate over Red Dye 3 and its potential health risks highlights the importance of food safety regulations and the need to evaluate food additives’ safety continually. While the food industry may resist the ban, it is ultimately up to consumers to decide whether or not they want to consume products containing Red Dye 3. With more and more people becoming aware of the potential risks associated with this food coloring, it’s likely that demand for Red Dye 3-free products will continue to grow.

CloudSDS provides free SDS Search to improve hazard awareness.